NEW YORK — Non-citizens dwelling in New York City won’t be allowed to vote in native elections.
A choose blocked the measure Monday after New York again in January turned the primary metropolis within the nation.
The legislation would have allowed almost 1 million folks to vote within the metropolis’s municipal elections, however as CBS2’s Christina Fan reported, Republicans challenged the measure, and received.
A day earlier than the first election, it is a main blow for voting rights advocates. Just seven months in the past, they rallied on City Hall steps to present non-citizens the precise to vote. On Monday, they discovered the short-lived legislation was defeated in court docket.
“We are emphasizing how important it is to emphasize your voice, and yet we continue to let 1 million New Yorkers remain silent in the process,” stated Wennie Chin of the New York Immigration Coalition.
Passed final December, Local Law 11 granted immigrants with inexperienced playing cards, work authorization, and DACA recipients the precise to vote in municipal elections beginning subsequent yr. But on Monday, the Richmond County Supreme Court struck down the groundbreaking growth, saying it violated the structure.
“The law is as clear as could possibly be,” New York City Council minority chief Joe Borelli stated.
Borelli was among the many group of Republican lawmakers who sued town, arguing it will change how they marketing campaign and dilute votes.
“Every administration, including the de Blasio administration and the Bloomberg administration, has been clear, saying this law would be unconstitutional and against the current statute. And now a judge has affirmed that decision,” Borelli stated.
The legislation might have allowed near 1 million New Yorkers vote for mayor, public advocate, City Council and borough presidents.
Supporters argued these residents are paying taxes and will have illustration.
“This is fundamentally unjust and unacceptable. I stand here with our city, our coalition to fight together to appeal this decision,” one individual stated.
A spokesperson with town Law Department wrote, “This is a disappointing court ruling for people who value bringing in thousands more New Yorkers into the democratic process. We are evaluating next steps.”
“We’re expecting an appeal, but I think the appeals judges will see that the law is clear as possibly can be,” Borelli stated.
“This is the opening round. This is going through the gates for the horse race. This is nothing yet,” litigation lawyer Andrew Lieb instructed CBS2’s Kevin Rincon.
Lieb stated there may be room for interpretation on the subject of the state’s structure.
“Because it says every citizen should be entitled to a vote. It doesn’t say to the exclusion of others,” Lieb stated.