Probe finds no evidence of GBV, sexual harassment during EFF MPs’ removal from Parliament | News24

  • There was no proof of gender-based violence or sexual harassment after the removing of EFF MPs from Parliament in the course of the funds debate in June.
  • This was a discovering in a report into the chaos.
  • However, the report discovered that Parliamentary Protection Services’ removing of the EFF MPs was characterised by violence on either side.

There was no proof of gender-based violence (GBV) and/or sexual harassment in the course of the removing of EFF members from Parliament, based on a report compiled after an unbiased investigation into the fracas.

In an announcement from Parliament, it emerged that speaker of the National Assembly, Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula, had appointed advocate Elizabeth Baloyi-Mere to probe allegations from EFF chief whip Floyd Shivambu and counter-allegations from Parliamentary Protection Services (PPS) personnel.

“In her report, Adv Baloyi-Mere ruled out GBV and sexual harassment in the scuffles between MPs and the PPS officials during the forceful removal of the disruptive members from the House on 9 and 10 June,” Parliament spokesperson Moloto Mothapo mentioned.

READ | Parliament probes sexual assault claims by EFF MPs thrown out of chaotic sittings

However, the report contained a discovering that the removing was characterised by violence on either side. 

Mothapo added that the EFF MPs refused to adjust to the directions of the speaker or ignored the speaker when it was clear, from the principles of the National Assembly, that when members are requested to depart the Chamber they need to accomplish that, in line with the conduct anticipated of them.

In addition, the report additionally contained a discovering that the speaker tried to adjust to each rule earlier than she known as for members to be eliminated. 

Although the investigation dominated out GBV and sexual harassment, Mapisa-Nqakula condemned any act of violence and assault that occurred in the course of the scuffle.

“She also remains distressed by the unfortunate disruptive occurrences in the Chamber on both days, as these do not augur well for the image, decorum and prestige of Parliament in the eyes of the public,” Mothapo mentioned.

Source link

Back to top button