Teffo provides no proof in denying allegations against him in application to have him disbarred | News24

Advocate Malesela Teffo is seen throughout the homicide trial of Senzo Meyiwa within the Gauteng High Court.

Alet Pretorius, Gallo Images

  • The Legal Practice Council has introduced an utility to have advocate Malesela Teffo both suspended or barred from practising regulation.
  • In responding to the appliance, Teffo supplied a blanket denial of the 22 allegations towards him.
  • In some cases, he claimed to have proof to assist his defence, however didn’t supply this proof to the court docket.

Advocate Malesela Teffo gave a blanket denial to all of the allegations towards him in an utility to have him barred from practising regulation, and argued that he ought to be given a postponement to organize his defence.

On Thursday, the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria heard an utility by the Legal Practice Council (LPC) to have Teffo both suspended or struck off the roll of advocates.

The utility was primarily based on 22 allegations of misconduct towards the controversial advocate, together with disrespectful and contemptuous behaviour in court docket, deceptive the court docket, assault, and the misappropriation of monies from shoppers.

The LPC’s allegations have been backed up by correspondence, affidavits and court docket data.

READ | Teffo in fight to stop Legal Practice Council from having him disbarred

On Friday, Teffo was anticipated to answer the submissions made by the LPC, however as a substitute he targeted his fundamental argument on why he ought to be given a postponement to organize his defence.

Teffo mentioned he had not obtained the court docket bundles containing all of the allegations and proof and as such had not been in a position to put together.

However, this was dismissed by the court docket, who discovered that he had the paperwork and ample time to organize. 

Claims with out proof

While arguing for a postponement, Teffo additionally tried to argue towards among the allegations, regardless of earlier telling the court docket that he wouldn’t be responding to “utterances by the so-called applicant”.

His first claim was that the court did not have to hear the application, because other “forums” were dealing with the allegations against him, but didn’t state which forums these were.

Teffo, who has recently come under fire for making unsubstantiated claims, told the court there was a serious vendetta against him by the South African Police Service.

He claimed that the application to have him struck off the roll was nothing more than retaliation from the police, the National Prosecuting Authority, the court and President Cyril Ramaphosa, but offered no further explanation of his conspiracy theory.

Teffo had previously accused police and Ramaphosa of orchestrating his arrest in the High Court in Pretoria on 28 April this year. He said a plan had been hatched to remove him from the Senzo Meyiwa trial where he was a defence counsel for four of the accused.

After Teffo allegedly assaulted a female officer at a SAPS building in Johannesburg, a court order was obtained interdicting him from entering the building.

Teffo claimed that the court order was fraudulent and told the court that he had proof, but did not share his proof with the court. 

Teffo then returned to his conspiracy theory that police, the NPA, the court and Ramaphosa were responsible for the application to have him struck off the roll, and demanded that an investigation into his claims take place. 

No factual counter to allegations 

Advocate Mfesane Ka-Siboto for the LPC told the court that Teffo had offered nothing to counter the allegations against him and that he could have attached evidence in his own defence and provided arguments.

Ka-Siboto maintained that the LPC had made out a factual case, which included affidavits by multiple people.

READ | Corruption, unethical conduct and lies: Teffo faces mounting claims as regulator seeks to disbar him

He additional shot down the concept that there was some form of collusion to bar Teffo from practising regulation.

Ka-Siboto mentioned it was unbelievable that police administration, the courts, and lay individuals had come collectively to make up a case towards Teffo.

The LPC additionally identified that whereas Teffo made a blanket denial of the allegations towards him, in some cases he submitted that he had proof to dispel the allegation, however failed to offer any proof to the court docket.

“The only form of rebuttal to factual claims was just denial,” Ka-Siboto argued.

Judgment had been reserved.

Source link

Back to top button